通行证  | 充值卡 | 客服中心 | 投放广告
首页 | 考研信息及复习指导 新闻动态 | 报考指南 | 复试调剂 | 复习指导 | 院校导航 | 专业学位 | 经验心得 | 客服中心 | 投稿 | 合作 ·付款方式·联系方式·服务保障
考研专卖店 试卷笔记 | 公共课书籍 | 辅导班 | 专业教材 | 学习卡 | 下载免费资料 政治资料 | 英语资料 | 数学资料 | 专业课资料 | 其他资料 | 收藏本站 设为首页
Q
导航: 易考网 >> 资讯中心 >> 专业学位 >> 法律硕士JM >> 文章正文
最 新 图 文
最 新 热 门
最 新 推 荐
相 关 文 章
2008考研新大纲公布 法硕联考增加物权法内容
辣评法硕排名前十的研究生院
考研参考:最需高学历十大专业之科学技术哲学
考研指导:法硕暑期复习高效攻略
法律硕士:非法律专业考生的明智选择
2006年全国法律硕士联考报考指南
2006年全国法律硕士联考考试大纲新变化汇总
2006年法律硕士联考大纲中国法制史
2006年法律硕士联考大纲法理学
2006年法律硕士联考大纲刑法学
考 研 资 讯
新闻动态 考研新闻 热点动态 地方新闻
报考指南 考研常识 考研贴士 政策法规 考研大纲
院校导航 全国招生院校考研信息汇总
复试调剂 复试常识 复试指导 调剂点拨 录取调剂
复习指导 英语复习 政治复习 数学复习 专业课复习
  历史学 教育学 心理学 名师导航
专业学位 MBA EMBA MPA 医学考研网 GCT-ME MPH
  法律硕士 教育硕士 会计硕士 在职考研
经验心得 考研故事 考研经验
考博专区 考博新闻 招生简章 复习指导 试题资料
全国考研资料地区导航
 A安徽 B北京 C重庆 F福建 G广东 G甘肃 G广西 G贵州
 H湖北 H湖南 H河北 H河南 H黑龙江 J吉林 J江苏 J江西
 L辽宁 N内蒙 S上海 S四川 S山东 S山西 S陕西 T天津
 Y云南 Z浙江 Z中科院 教育学统考 心理学统考 历史学
 (全国资料由易考网提供,点击www.chinakao.cn发现更多)
 >> 对外经济贸易大学03年法律硕士加试英语试卷         
对外经济贸易大学03年法律硕士加试英语试卷
佚名 文章来源:不详 点击数: 更新时间:2006-2-22     
[ 字体:缩小 正常 放大 | 双击自动滚屏 ]  

  一。解释下列名词(可用中文或英文解释, 并选作其中的五个, 每个6分,共30分):

  1.Acceptance     2. Agent      3. Stock

  4. Defence      5. Evidence     6.Civil procedure

  7.Partnership 8. Strict liability

  二。将下列英文翻译成中文(共 40分):

  1.A contract cannot exist unless someone has made an offer to enter into a contract. An offer states what the offeror will do and what he expects in exchange. For an offer to be valid, the offeror must intend to make the offer and must communicate it to the offeree. Sol says to Barbara, “I”ll promise to sell you this model boat if you will promise to pay me $150.“ Sol, the offeror, has made an offer to Barbara, the offeree.

  2.The New Deal reformers under President Franklin Roosevelt were determined to provide an honest marketplace for securities. By means of two statutes, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Act of 1934, they permanently altered the way that publicly traded corporations had to treat the purchasers and holders of their securities .They also changed both the ethical and operational aspects of buying and selling securities.

  三。阅读下面的起诉书并回答问题(请用中文回答, 共30分):

  Complaint

  1.The plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Ohio.

  2.The defendant Cardinal Skyhook Corp. is an Ohio corporation whose principal place of business is located in Franklin County.

  3.The Defendant Donald H. (Driver) is a resident of Franklin County.

  4.At all times relevant to this Complaint, Driver was employed by Cardinal Skyhook Corp. and was acting within scope of his employment.

  5.On May 14, 1989, at approximately 9:30 a.m. ,Driver was operating a van belonging to Cardinal Skyhook Corp. in an easterly direction on Main Street in Columbus.

  6.While proceeding at a speed in excess of the posted limit,Driver negligently caused the van to cross the center line and strike a 1988 Ford truck owned by the plaintiff which was lawfully parked on the north side of the street.

  7.The truck, valued at $19,000, and its contents, 35 crates of widgets valued at $35,000, were a total loss.

  Wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment against Cardinal Skyhook Corp, or against Donald H. Driver, or against both of them in the sum of $54,000 and the costs of this action.

   Buckeye Widgets Corp.

   By Its Attorney
文章录入:admin    责任编辑:admin 
  • 上一篇文章:

  • 下一篇文章:
  • 发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
    易考网版权、投稿与免责申明:

    1)凡本网署名文字、图片和音视频稿件,版权均属易考网所有。任何媒体、网站或个人未经本网协议授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式复制发表。已经本网协议授权的媒体、网站,在下载使用时必须注明稿件来源:易考网,违者本网将依法追究责任。
    2)本网注明"文章来源:xxx(非本站)"的文章均为转载稿,本网转载出于传递更多信息之目的。此类稿件并不代表本网观点,本网不承担此类稿件侵权行为的直接责任及连带责任。
    3. 如因作品内容、版权等需要同本网联系的,请在作品在本网发表之日起30日内联系,否则视为放弃相关权利。

    网友评论:(只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)